Skip to main content
Please wait...
took to the mic at the conference to provide a report on the status of La haina fire recovery efforts. To date, the MUA has donated approximately $150,000.00 to Lahaina relief efforts and, following Wolff’s report, donat ed an additional $15,000.00.
Conference speakers highlighted the struggle to combat corporate and government anti-union efforts, industry projections around off-shore wind energy, and the Union’s work to secure national legislation similar to the U.S. Jones Act.
dustry have participated in Steward training put on by the Local. The Division decided to create an indus try-specific Steward training that would give longshore members the most targeted training possible, fo cused on issues particular to the docks. This round of training was part one of the new three-part training created and implemented by the HLD.
The training included industry-spe cific contract enforcement methods and a rich history lesson on the ILWU. Division Director Dustin Dawson pro vided an enlightening history of the creation of the Longshore Division.
It’s been a busy month for the Hawaiʻi Longshore Division. Twenty members of the HLD trav eled to Adelaide, Australia at the end of February to attend the Maritime Union of Australia’s Quadrennial National Conference. The MUA covers 16,000 maritime workers in Australia across various industries, including longshore.
as corporations make moves to take our jobs.”

ILWU members were called to the stage as MUA leadership recalled the historic solidarity shown in 1998 when West Coast locals refused to unload an Australian ship that was loaded by scab labor. This solidarity forged deep and lasting bonds that endure today.
Steward training blitz
Upon their return, HLD Officers, Reps, and Business Agents entered a four-island Steward training blitz. The training began on March 6th at the Harry Kamoku Hall in Hilo, where 14 Stewards attended. This was followed by Maui on March 20th and Oʻahu on the 22nd, where upwards of 100 long shore workers were trained as Stewards.
When asked about the emphasis on history, Business Agent Tyrone Tahara commented, “It’s imporatnt for longshore workers today to un derstand the sacrifices made by those who came before them and to feel that they are a apart of something larger than themselves.”
Solidarity key focus The ILWU along with maritime and longshore unions from around the world were invited to attend. Local 142 Secretary-Treasurer Mike Victorino Jr. was among those in at tendance. “Global solidarity was the focus. It’s important that we under stand all of the issues in the industry. It was clear at the conference that everyone is committed to eachoth er - ready to stand with eachother
Last Fall, solidarity between the two Unions was in action at the War on the Wharves charity boxing event, hosted for the first time by the Hawaiʻi Longshore Division at the ʻAlohilani Hotel. Members of HLD and MUA kept up the comraderie with sparring and practice events during the MUA conference.

HLD Division Rep Brandon Wolff
as Stewards. The final training took place on Kauaʻi on March 27th.

Since the Division was created in 2010, mem bersfrom the longshore in
History of the ILWU Housing Program
FRED GALDONES IS PRESIDENT EMERITUS OF THE ILWU LOCAL 142. HE RETIRED IN 2010. HE WAS ONE OF 4 SPEAKERS ON A PANEL ON HOUSING PRESENTED AT THE FULL TIME OFFICERS CONFERENCE. HIS TALK IS PRESENTED IN FULL HERE AS A CLEAR AND INSIGHTFUL HISTORY OF THE ILWU’S WORK, OFTEN LEAD AT THE UNIT LEVEL, TO SECURE AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR MEMBERS.
“Building as a group or collective bargaining, as we know it, was the way to negotiate the lowest cost, in comparison to having each person build on their own.”
Through collective bargaining, the ILWU was successful in negotiating employee housing at a reasonable cost.

In 1956-1958 the rent was:

For a single person renting single men’s quarters, based on the size of the room and the condition of the house, ranged from $3.00 to $19.00 per month.

For a family renting a home it ranged from $10.00 to $44.00 depending on the square footage of the home and its condition.

Water supplied by the sugar company was $1.00 per month.

The sugar industry was facing strong market competition from the European countries who were subsidized by their government, which could not be matched
by the US government, despite the sugar industry and the ILWU lobbying heavily to get favorable conditions in the Sugar Act.

The cost of goods and mate rials continued to increase. There were increases in wage rates. Cost to do business increased. The sugar companies continued to look for ways to improve efficiency and reduce their losses.

In 1969-1972, sixteen years later, through collective bargaining, the ILWU was able to keep the rents the same. Recognizing the industry’s efforts to reduce their losses, especially in
non-productive areas such as employee housing, sometime after 1965, the union leadership of Unit 6 of ILWU Local 142, representing workers at Pepeekeo Sugar Company, discussed having employees

owning their own homes. This was progressive think ing that was not readily accepted by the members of the Union be cause they were enjoying low-cost rental housing and would have to start paying mortgage at a higher rate. And there would be layoffs as the carpenter department would be eliminating jobs.

Be mindful that the ILWU, back in the mid-1950’s, agreed that in order to improve efficiency the sugar companies had to change their harvesting method
from using flumes to harvest the cane from the fields, which was labor intensive, to using machinery to do the same job. This meant a major job elimination of the laborers in that department. However, the ILWU was successful in negotiating repatriation pay for those who returned to their homeland.

This was a bold move on the Union’s part but progressive thinking on the part of the Union’s leadership. In this housing situation, again, it was a bold move, and looking at where the sugar industry is today, it was the correct thing to do.

The management at Pepeekeo Sugar Company agreed to set aside land area to develop a subdivision to build homes owned by the employees. In the process, the company would gradually close down plantation camps and in the long term, eliminate cost associated with employee housing.

—continued on page 8